Monday, April 22, 2013

Alienation Among Aliens



It  seems to be a generally accepted notion,  that the home grown terrorists, that is, the people who have resided in the USA either as naturalized citizens or green card holders who enjoy almost all rights of a citizen except not be able to vote in elections tend to become  terrorists because they suffer from isolation. They do not feel totally accepted in their new homeland and the ties with the land they left behind is gradually severing due to distance and infrequent contacts. They feel like misfits. Naturally. Alien misfits become terrorists. Hardly.

It is also generally accepted among elite media as well as the security authorities that the USA need to do more to make immigrants feel less isolated, more welcome and totally assimilated. It is this nation's job to provide such ease and comfort. Not entirely possible. Someone even cited an example of Irish immigrants of early years who having suffered alienation by this country became communists. It is not quite an appropriate example. If the USA had provided assimilation, or if they had not left their homeland does one really think communism would not have sprung among them? The comparison is not only ridiculous but is quite outrageous.

My take on this is that yes, all immigrants feel like misfits to some extent, initially. They have adopted a land which is so different in customs, language, religion, food, dressing and laws from the land they left. I was and am still a misfit. Now for a long time.

The immigrants choose this land to be their land of opportunity and prosperity. The first wave of  immigrants do well; do well despite lot of struggle. They understand; transplanting is full of trials. They manage to survive the tribulations because they learn to separate their home life from the outside the home life. They maintain their original lifestyle undisturbed, uninterrupted and suffer no inner conflicts within the confines of four walls of their homes. And, I am very happy to say that this country preserves and respects the sanctity of four walls called home.

It is the young children of emigres who have the most difficulties. When they go to school they face different world than what their parents expose them to at home. The conflicts emerge in children's minds when they are taught at home, overtly, covertly  as well as sublimally, that the parents' customs, culture, dressing and religion are superior to that of the USA. The kids become conflicted and have enormous difficulties adjusting to this duality. For children to process any kind of conflicting duality is difficult. At the end what is taught at home wins out because of their love and adulations for their parents. Parents cannot be wrong!

The USA need not assume the entire responsibility for making misfits and thus the terrorists out of immigrants. The settlers themselves have and do contributed/contribute  a lot towards their own alienation and therefore bitterness.



   

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Picasso


I see them. They are distorted. Yet, I find them appealing. I often question if I cut the distortions and rearrange them in their proper order would they be coherent? And the answer is, no.

They may cohere in one sense, perhaps, and completely incohere in another.

Picasso was unrivaled in his originality, in my mind. Here are few pictures of his paintings from the exhibit we attended. Perhaps, he made them grotesque only to make us face our own demons that reside within. 



Himself rendering the famous peice of sculpture that adorns Chicago street















Random






900 Michigan Avenue










Art Institute of Chicago Rediscovered



Buddha, life uncluttered













Monday, March 25, 2013

A Response


In response to an article in Time magazine by Fareed Zakaria I wrote to him the following:

http://ideas.time.com/2013/03/14/10-big-ideas/slide/write-a-constitution/




Mr. Fareed Zakaria
Time Magazine
Issue dated March 25th, 2013
Article: “Write A Constitution” by Fareed Zakaria

Dear Sir,


I recognize and acknowledge the absolute significance of a constitution in a Democracy. But I beg to differ in one aspect. Unless the countries in your article adopt secularism and basic principles of a democracy first free societies cannot prevail. A fair and balanced Constitution can only follow secularism. Here is how I see it.


You say, sir that Arab Spring has not fared well. You also cite the examples of the Eastern Bloc countries of previous Soviet Unions which are either dictatorships or teetering to fail democracies. But you have omitted to mention one of the greatest success stories of twentieth century by name; India. As imperfect a democracy it has, it took roots there. It is functioning. And, it is functioning rather well in many ways. And that is precisely because it was a secular nation then and is now. An Indian may be fervently religious individually but collectively he is secular. Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi who earned India and Pakistan their freedom understood the politics of religion and the politics of non-violence. After the Partition look, what happened in Pakistan! It has had so many Military rules!


India wrote its Constitution after it earned its self-rule. The basic doctrine of Democracy is, rule “of the people, by the people and for the people, and not “of the people, by the religion and for the religion”. Until the basic credo of Democracy and secularism are adopted I do not believe any of these nations will have true Democracies or balanced Constitutions where State and Religion are considered separate.


By the way, secularism in India flourished only because of its roots in poly-theistic religion of hindus; it makes them tolerant towards a few extra gods; allahs, jesuses, buddhas and mazdas.


Mrs. Charu Gandhi




Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Pope Francis



Pope Francis-March 2013-Photo Time Mgazine courtesy

As I had thought Vatican  and the rest of the Christian world is fed up with the arrogance of the USA and the Western Europe. Also, they are fed up with the sex abuse scandals that is raging in USA. So, they selected someone from Latin America.

Time will tell if this was the wise choice for Catholics, Women, and Children.

Of late I am hearing and reading that Priests and Clergies from the USA and the Europe are moving to helm the christendom in third world countries. Is it because they are, perhaps guilty of scandalous behaviour and want to avoid public and legal scrutiny?