I wanted to know what about the "Frankly Speaking" that caused
such stir.
I watched the entire interview of Rahul Gandhi by Arnab Goswami. It
was long, tedious and pathetic. Rahul came across, ignorant, non-commitant and
repetitious. Rahul had two solutions for every problem posed to him; ‘empower
women’ and follow the process. There is no defending him.
Arnab asked the same questions repeatedly. In certain set-up
it can be construed as ‘badgering the witness’. But he can be excused as he had
forewarned the interviewee of such onslaught. Had he not asked the same question
more than three times at the most, the interview would have been short and the
viewers would have been spared the tedium and embarrassment. Once it is established that Rahul
does not measure up to the task it was not necessary to badger him. The audience
who cared to watch the interview, I believe, was smart enough to
get the picture soon enough.
I do not know Indian politics nor am I qualified to comment
on it. But I certainly would not vote for this man, Rahul Gandhi.
I see interviews like
this almost every day. Only yesterday when an American Congressman was
confronted by a reporter about his alleged involvement in corruption, he
literally threatened the reporter to throw him off the balcony or break him in
half. I do not condone that either.
In this regard, at least, I congratulate Rahul; he did not lose his cool.
And, I congratulate Arnab on being persistent.